
vPC vs VSS
Both Virtual PortChannel (vPC) and Virtual Switching System (VSS) are Cisco technologies designed to improve network redundancy and bandwidth utilization by eliminating Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) blockages. However, they operate differently and are used in different scenarios.
Lets explore the differences between the two.
Virtual PortChannel (vPC)
vPC allows two separate physical switches (Nexus series) to appear as a single logical switch to a downstream device (like a server or another switch) by combining their links into a single PortChannel. It is used in Cisco Nexus switches (data center environments).
Features of vPC
- Multi-Chassis EtherChannel: Enables a server/switch to bundle links across two Nexus switches.
- No STP Blocking: All links are active (no blocked ports).
- Independent Control Planes: Each switch maintains its own management plane.
- Used with: FEX (Fabric Extenders), servers, storage, and other switches.
How vPC Works
Two Nexus switches form a vPC domain and synchronize using vPC peer-keepalive and vPC peer-link. A downstream device (e.g., a server) connects to both switches via a PortChannel, thinking it’s connected to a single switch.
Use Cases for vPC
- Data center server connectivity (active-active links).
- Storage networks (SAN/NAS dual-homed connections).
- Avoiding STP bottlenecks in Layer 2 networks.
Virtual Switching System (VSS)
VSS combines two physical Catalyst switches (6500/6800 series) into a single logical switch with one control plane. It is used in Cisco Catalyst switches (enterprise/core networks).
Features of VSS
- Single Logical Switch: Two switches act as one (single management IP, single STP instance).
- Simplified Management: One configuration applies to both switches.
- Active/Standby Supervisor: One switch controls forwarding (the other is standby).
- Used with: Core/distribution layer switches.
How VSS Works
Two Catalyst switches are connected via Virtual Switch Link (VSL). One switch becomes the active supervisor, handling all control plane functions. Downstream devices see them as a single switch.
Use Cases for VSS
- Enterprise core/distribution layer redundancy.
- Campus networks requiring simplified STP and high availability.
- Reducing network complexity (single logical switch).
Comparison Table: VPC vs VSS
Feature | Virtual PortChannel (vPC) | Virtual Switching System (VSS) |
Cisco Platform | Nexus switches (Nexus 7000, 9000) | Catalyst switches (6500, 6800) |
Control Plane | Independent (each switch has its own) | Merged into one (active/standby) |
Data Plane | Active-active forwarding | Active-standby (one supervisor handles forwarding) |
Peer Connection | vPC peer-link + keepalive | Virtual Switch Link (VSL) |
STP Behavior | No STP blocking (all links active) | Single STP instance (simplified topology) |
Management | Each switch managed separately | Single logical switch (one management IP) |
Use Case | Data center (Nexus) | Enterprise core (Catalyst) |
Continue Reading:
Tag:comparison